With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. With the M9, just going out for a day I would take two batteries. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didn't need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Keep up the good words! The type of viewfinder that the camera has. Although I know right from the gate that my M-P Typ 240 wont get as much use as my new heart winning M9-P, it will however keep me from having that inevitable internal debate of owning just one old or new M body. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . To each his own. Thanks a lot for all your helpful comments. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. It doesnt even have any way to connect the Atomos to it. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. Got a spare lottery ticket? Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. I took the M240 because it offeres live view. So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! Im really glad I ordered it, the best Leica M camera Ive ever used! In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. With the wrong card, the wait before the shutter is again available is bad. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. And then I got a Sony A7riii that lets me touch the screen to pick the subject I want the camera to autofocus on! The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. . LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. Itd be a waste of time when you can go and find other reviews that no doubt do high ISO comparisons with other brands of cameras etc. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. The latter requires the lens to have 6-bit coding or manual setting of the lens in the main menu. Ive got a 262 and I really like the fact that its completely stripped back to just the basics. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. Its based on the body of the M240, but as Ive said, when it was released it was pitched as a more affordable stripped-back camera with less features. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. Compared to when I shot with any other camera system, my gut feeling is I come away with fewer shotsless spray and pray . JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. And if you find the viewfinder better, as many report. Thanks for the insights Louis! So I am very glad I got the 240 version. With some apprehension, I took the memory card out of the camera and put it into the computer. Personally, I tire of the constant whining about Leica prices. I wont go into too much more detail now, but for saying that unlike the M240 and M262 that Ive otherwise used since the M9, the Leica M10-P really feels like it has []. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. These were live-view using the screen on the back or a slot in electronic viewfinder and video. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. November 7, 2013 December 8, 2013 Peter . As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. This is an inspiring and generous website. My GAS was satisfied with a Z6 with the M-to-Z adapter. My first experience discovering I like live-view on a rangefinder was had down the pub quite soon after Id bought the Leica M240. You can post now and register later. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. Id prefer to do this with the Leica as its the camera I use most often and so the battery is always charged with space on a memory card. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). The Leica M-D (Typ 262) ($5,995) is the camera for photographers who wish that digital didn't happen. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. Equally, Ive not found the dynamic range to be too limited. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. Im not going to go into details here to be honest. . It is a quick overview and specs comparisonLeica M-E Typ 240 vs Leica M typ 262====="Subscribe and Share" for more Videosht. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Pera I think you might be giving a little to much benefit of the doubt there . Shedding some light on the sources of noise, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2022, Leica adds 12-bit Cinema 4K Raw video output, improved AF features and more to its SL2-S, A closer look at the Leica M11 (photo gallery), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. If not, moderators please delete this post. RE: the ISO issue. Live-view brings something extra to a type of camera I had previously (possibly quite stubbornly) felt couldnt be improved. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. M262 is simple M240 less some features not necessary to still picture but in M240, those features can be ignored. Find out more about 35mmc here. What is the highest ISO you are comfortable with the 240/262?I find the focus peaking on my M10 better than the Sonys Ive used. The M Typ 240 can record in Full HD at 24, 25 or 30fps. After a few weeks of using the new Leica M262 I posted a review along with a few videos. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. Thankfully with the M10 they've returned to the old system. Both are great cameras and either would be fine. On the other hand, if you do describe your GAS in terms of Leicas, and suggest a Monochrom is the kind of thing you forget in a cupboard, well. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? We think it rises to the challenge. We were shooting inside a large carpet manufacturers in Kidderminster and I was trying to get some slightly abstract well timed shots of the various goings on in the factory. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. Thanks. Learn how your comment data is processed. But even this hasnt really bothered me too much it might be a little clumsy what with the need to press 3 buttons when you want to change ISO, but the way the auto ISO works pretty much makes up for it. High quality battery charger is a handy companion for digital shooting. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . I find the M262 colours different enough from the M-P I just sold - to my eye the blues, reds, aquas and purples feel denser. That alone justifies the decision to buy. Not because its a bad camera, quite the opposite; its a fantastic camera, I just find there to be so little to report or to get overly excited about. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. My guess is that many of the Leica purists won't be bothered at all by this decision. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. I cant. Some cards are woefully slow. Focusing that close without rangefinder coupling is of course quite difficult unless you have live-view. I was even contemplating selling my Leica lenses and the M3 as well, but I love using that film M system (and film photography) so much that I could not do it (at least not yet)! The M10 is also very slightly lighter than the M240. The M240 feels, well, fuller. Can you compare side by side, please? I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. A few years later I sold all my Nikon DLSR kit and switched to Sony full frame A7 cameras and began to realise just how useful it can be. Great Image quality (warmer than M-10, looks more like M-9 CCD image rendering). This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. Help us by suggesting a value. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. But, as someone who shoots, buys and sells a lot of different lenses, the bigger screen would definitely offer me an advantage Id be able to take photos and check lenses were calibrated properly etc. With a higher light sensitivity (ISO level), the sensor absorbs more light. Ultra-niche appeal. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I so rarely hit the menu button on this camera, it practically doesnt need to be there for my purposes, and Id imagine most users find the same. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. Thankfully with the M10 theyve returned to the old system. Find out more about 35mmc here. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason I went for the M262 instead of the M240 when I was looking to replace my M9. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. I have one for the M240 and dont use it that much but at times it helps with critical focus. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10. I could sell the M262, and my beloved Monochrom (and maybe a couple of lenses), thus satisfying the GAS problem and simultaneously slimming down my cameras without actually having to spend any more money or as my mate James would say, I could make this a revenue-neutral purchase. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. Everything is very tactile. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . The big round dial on the back of the M9 was always tricky to use. Actually, a large part of this is because they dont often inspire me to write about them whilst I own them, yet I hate to see them go without doing them the justice of sharing a few thoughts.var cid='8222364248';var pid='ca-pub-7054871687658000';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0';var ffid=1;var alS=1002%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} Value for money, incredible quality. In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain situations. Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. I used the M240 for over two years before upgrading to the M10 a year and a half ago. As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. They arent rangefinder coupled past 1m, but nonetheless they do focus that close. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. Image: Leica. It uses a 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor with a near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. It was that feeling that having less kit would do me good This became the excuse I needed to change up to the M10. I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. A M262 is a friendly camera. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. I think the sensor is the same, only the signal processing is different because there is no LV. But even then, its not close to other modern cameras. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. M-E "CCD" M9 M9-P CCD. There is an M240 feature that can get you there with User Settings, and right now I cant recall how easily accessible that is.In Camera BW filter Simulations. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. The sensor is not the same, by the way. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. As is the image quality of the M10. I dont need to get excited by them dont get me wrong, theres fun in a camera that provides some sort of novelty initially, but longer-term I just need my cameras to work in a way that suits me. Well worth seeking out. Hence, I literally could not give a single poop what Para thinks . Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. Another M10 fetish. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. In one of his editorial pieces in Amateur Photographer he applauds this philosophy. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. Cheers! Aluminium body makes is nice and light. It only having felt right once in 6 months felt wrong. This happens with the M240 from time to time. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. No more out of focus shots. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? I like Roger a lot hes written for this site before, and we chatted a fair bit around the time. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. The battery can be recharged and used over again. I posted this as a person of experience. I did eventually get the 1.25 viewfinder magnifier to go with it. No. In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. I sometimes shot movies and it was amazing. Never came to me idea to compare them side by side, sorry. Your previous content has been restored. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. Additionally, I really like the simplified look and small upgrades the MP versions offer. When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. Though I prefer using Rolleiflex and an old M4 for my creative projects. I would have bought a 90 Macro lens if I had live view on the camera even though Ive already got a Nikon with 105 Macro. As I don't need money selling them "cheap", I'm happy to keep them all for what they are, using each one equally. Source: DxOMark. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. I upgraded from the M9 on single basis that I wanted a camera with a better screen. If you want video and live view, get the 240. Size/weight is perfect . Simple. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. The use of a CMOS sensor allowed Leica to include two key features that the previous M9 didnt have. Image quality will be essentially the same. Paste as plain text instead, Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. . Hes written some good books, too, some with his partner, Frances. I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. Our camera evaluations and conclusions are based . Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. BECOME A MEMBER to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMbqwh98qO5wWowtQjIK8ig/joinEXCLUSIVE PRESETS FOR IMAGES CAPTURED WITH LEICA CAMERAS:. I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. Unfortunately, my business partner has also vetoed the idea of me selling both M240 and M262 to buy an M10. To make pictures, those are good bodies to be used with good lens. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! The Leica M10-R rangefinder camera has a newly developed 40 megapixel sensor that represents a big increase from the 24 megapixels of the previous M10 model. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. If tapping the top plate sounded a bit hollow: remember its aluminium not brass in the 262, Sure. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. Live-view with any lens I liked was fun. I guess that how much I miss the live-view will define how soon, if at all, I start saving my pennies for a swap. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. This page is currently only available in English. I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. For me, theres no place for a comment like Peras. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. The new Leica M is the most innovative and versatile M-Camera that the modern M-System has ever created. Its user interface is simple, uncluttered and largely very logical. 1) Slimmer - The M10 has a slimmer camera body than the M240, similar to the Leica film cameras such as a Leica M6. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. May be different sensor calibration? So its not a financial burden to have it around, and selling it wont yield me that much cash, and I have no desire to sell it anyways since its my favorite M of all time that still serves some legitimate purpose. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. I did, yes I have an M10-P now. Help us by suggesting a value. My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. More about being to see the settings at a glance, rather than just be able to change them easily. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. homestead high school staff. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. Why poor white balance, plus bad color in JPEG files, for Q2 camera? Use your experience to help others in the community make a decision. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore.
Jeff Bridges And Kurt Russell Related, Articles L